🔗 Share this article

The count of reserved seats for Indigenous council members on New Zealand local authorities will be cut by over 50%, after a controversial legislative amendment that forced municipal councils to put the fate of hard-won Indigenous wards to a popular referendum.

Historical Context on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which can include one or more councillors depending on demographic data, were established in 2001 to give Māori electors the option to elect a guaranteed Māori representative in local and regional authorities. Initially, local governments were only able to establish a Indigenous seat by first submitting it to a community referendum in their area. Communities often spent years generating community backing and pushing their councils to create Indigenous representation.

Policy Changes and Government Actions

To address this concern, the previous Labour government allowed municipal authorities to set up a Indigenous seat without first requiring them to subject it to a popular ballot.

However, this year, the current administration reversed the change, stating local residents ought to determine whether to establish Indigenous representation.

Voting Outcomes

The new legislation mandated local authorities that had created a ward under Labour’s rules to conduct binding referendums alongside the municipal polls, which concluded on 11 October. Of 42 councils participating in the public vote, 17 voted to retain their seats, and twenty-five to disestablish theirs – showing numerous areas against guaranteed Māori representation.

These outcomes provided “a crucial move in restoring community self-determination.”

Critics however have condemned the new policy as “racist” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the current administration has ushered in sweeping rollbacks to measures intended to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. The government has stated it aims to terminate “ethnic-specific” policies, and says it is dedicated to enhancing results for Indigenous people and every citizen.

Geographical Splits

The results of the referendums were split down city-country divisions – six of the seven urban centers required to vote backed Indigenous seats, while countryside areas leaned strongly towards removing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to hit their stride.”

Electoral Participation and Concerns

This year’s municipal polls registered the smallest electoral participation in over three decades, with less than a third of eligible voters participating, prompting demands for reform.

The process had been “a mockery”.

Differential Standards

Councils are permitted to establish different wards – such as countryside seats – without initially mandating a public vote. The disparate requirements placed on Māori wards suggested the administration was singling out Māori representation.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Numerous localities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark concerned the 17 regions that voted to retain their wards.