🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn followers viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous respondents applauding your advice on growing your venture? Are headhunters making contact to discuss opportunities?

If not, the explanation might be that you're not male.

The Test: Modifying Profile Gender to achieve Increased Reach

Numerous women participated in a collective LinkedIn experiment recently after popular discussions suggested that changing their gender to "male" boosted their platform visibility.

Some participants rewrote their profiles to incorporate what they called "masculine-oriented" language - adding results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Based on reports, their visibility also improved.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether an inherent gender bias in the platform's system prioritizes male users who use online business jargon.

Like many large social media platforms, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to decide which posts appear to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but stated it does not factor in "demographic information" when determining post visibility. Rather, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" influence how content perform.

Changing gender in your settings does not affect how your posts shows up in search or feed.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who modified her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "a masculine version", described remarkable outcomes.

"The numbers I'm observing indicate a 1,600% increase in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she commented.

Another professional, a communications strategist, began experimenting after observing her reach decrease substantially.

The Process

• First, she modified her gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Lastly, she repurposed previous content with similar "assertive" style

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in visibility within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Although the success, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my posts were softer - concise and clever, but also warm and relatable," she explained. "Currently, the masculine version was assertive and confident - like a white male being overly confident."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, stating "Each day I persisted, and outcomes improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Not all testers encountered favorable outcomes. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "male" and her race to "Caucasian" reported a reduction in reach and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it operates in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Broader Implications

These tests coincide with ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in recent months have apparently resulted in female creators experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in unofficial tests where identical posts by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to classify and distribute posts based on various elements, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company states it regularly evaluates its systems, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

Company representative proposed that current reductions in certain members' visibility might stem from increased competition due to more content on the network.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she commented. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."